Sometimes, life hands you an obvious choice, a golden opportunity to change your fate, and yet… you just don’t take it. That’s the story of Sporting Kansas City right now. The transfer market was there, open and gleaming like a diamond in the rough. Alan Pulido, who occupies that coveted DP (Designated Player) slot, was on the verge of being moved. The chance to bring in a striker who could ignite the offense was on the table. But what did they do? Absolutely nothing.
Pulido, with all due respect to his contributions to the club, isn’t the guy you can trust to be your match-winner anymore. Everyone knows Sporting KC needs goals, needs creativity, needs life in the final third. So what was the front office’s response? They signed an aging center-back, Joaquín Fernández, on a short-term deal, passing up the opportunity to bring in a true goal-scorer or a speedy winger to slice through opposing defenses.
Follow MLS Multiplex on X (Twitter).
What drives a club struggling to find the back of the net to ignore the most crucial part of the game? Signing Fernández feels like another attempt to stop the bleeding that’s been going on for a while. But as we all know, band-aids don’t fix broken bones. And Sporting KC’s issues run much deeper than just a leaky defense.
Are the executives even watching the same games as the rest of us? Are they tracking the same stats? Because, honestly, it’s tough to understand how you can watch a team constantly stumble when it comes to putting the ball in the net and think the solution is to add another defender to the roster. Sure, the defense might need some help, but the attack? That’s the area screaming for help!
Pulido, of course, isn’t the only problem. The lack of a quality “number 10” is painfully obvious too. Without someone to create chances, open up spaces, and feed the forwards, Sporting KC continues to look like an orchestra without a conductor. The team feels chaotic, disorganized, missing that touch of class that separates the good from the great.
Instead of making the changes that were truly needed, Sporting KC decided to double down on Pulido and even let go of Marinos Tzionis, a young talent who’s now headed to FK Cukaricki. Let’s be real, he wasn’t exactly the game-changer who’d turn the season around, but his exit doesn’t seem to bring any immediate benefit either. And in his place? Fernández, who will probably help keep the defense from completely collapsing, but is unlikely to be the guy to reshape the team.
Sporting KC needs goals, they need creativity, they need bold moves in the transfer market. But what did they do? They played it safe, bet on conservatism. If the goal was to stabilize the defense and try to hold things together, fine, the signing makes some sense. But soccer isn’t just about defense. It’s also about that moment when a forward picks up the ball just outside the box, takes on one or two defenders, and fires a shot into the top corner. And, frankly, I don’t see this Sporting KC delivering that kind of moment to their fans anytime soon.
Fernández might do his job competently—I’m not here to knock the guy. But he’s not the player who’s going to set the attack on fire, who’s going to solve the team’s chronic problems up front. And that’s the real issue. Sporting KC is ignoring the most urgent need, perhaps hoping that with a sturdier defense, the attack will somehow sort itself out.
What we’re left with is a team that opted for the simplest solution, the one with the least risk but also the least reward. Sporting KC could’ve rolled the dice, released Pulido, and used that DP slot to bring in a player who’d truly make a difference. They could’ve gone after a striker who puts fear into opposing defenses, or a midfielder who creates scoring chances out of thin air. But no. They chose to play it safe. The big question now is—will Sporting KC end up paying the price for this choice?