If you've been following soccer for a while, chances are you’ve heard of Pep Guardiola. The guy's a legend. And rightfully so. His positional play style has flipped the sport on its head, and now almost everyone’s trying to imitate it. But is the Spaniard’s work truly one-of-a-kind? That’s where two more names come in—one familiar to American fans and the other, not so much: Wilfried Nancy and Fernando Diniz. Two coaches with styles of play that, at first glance, seem worlds apart from Pep’s, but if we dig a little deeper, they may just be chasing the same goal.
Follow MLS Multiplex on X (Twitter).
Nancy is the Silent Maestro with his "NancyBall"
Wilfried Nancy is that coach who flies under the radar, but he really shouldn’t. At Columbus Crew, he’s turned his team into a ball possession machine that almost floats across the field. And that’s no accident. Nancy’s developed his own philosophy, something his players affectionately call "NancyBall." The secret to his success? Freedom within a system. He wants his players to move, create space, and take control of the game. But unlike Guardiola, who works with fixed positions and a nearly choreographed setup, Nancy is more flexible. He mixes positional play concepts with a kind of fluidity that challenges his players to think and react collectively.
And the wild part? It works. His players feel empowered, like they're solving puzzles on the field. It’s not just about tactics; it’s about psychology—making his athletes believe they can control the game, no matter who’s on the other side. In the end, Nancy might actually be more like Guardiola than we realize. Both strive for total control of the match; Nancy just does it with a looser, less rigid approach.
Guardiola Prefers Order in Chaos
Now, when we talk about Guardiola, we’re talking about order. The guy's almost like a mad scientist of soccer, constantly searching for the perfect formula to dominate the opponent. His positional play is practically a work of art—players spread across the field in strategic spots, always ready to receive the ball, always knowing exactly where their teammates are. And this doesn’t just happen by chance. Pep drills these movements over and over in training until every player knows their role inside out. His team controls the game with patience, waiting for the perfect moment to strike—like a snake ready to pounce.
But don’t think that means his style is rigid. Actually, it’s a carefully rehearsed dance. Sure, there’s structure in terms of positioning, but at the same time, that structure allows for an almost ridiculous level of fluidity in their passing. Guardiola has turned soccer into a form of art, where every move is calculated to wear down the opponent both physically and mentally. What sets him apart from Wilfried Nancy and Fernando Diniz, though, is that while Pep seeks total control from start to finish, Nancy and Diniz embrace a bit of chaos.
Fernando Diniz is Soccer’s Anarchist
And then there’s Fernando Diniz, the guy whose style of play is chaos personified. But don’t get me wrong—this chaos is entirely intentional. Diniz loves to break the traditional rules of soccer. His teams are known for insane movement, with every player crowding around the ball. He doesn’t want his players standing still, waiting for the ball to come to them; he wants them moving, creating, invading spaces where they shouldn’t be. It seems disorganized, but it’s all part of the plan. The idea is to throw the opponent off balance, make them lose their bearings, and create openings.
Diniz is almost the anti-Guardiola, but with the same goal in mind: ball possession. He wants his teams to have the ball, but instead of doing it patiently, he does it aggressively, creating a frantic pace that leaves the opponent scrambling. It’s like he’s playing a disordered version of Guardiola’s positional play, but deep down, he’s after the same thing: total domination of the game.
What Do Nancy, Guardiola, and Diniz Have in Common?
Follow MLS Multiplex on X (Twitter).
What’s really interesting is realizing that despite their differences, Nancy, Guardiola, and Diniz are all heading in the same direction. They want their teams to dominate with possession. They want their players comfortable with the ball at their feet. They want their teams to be the protagonists on the field. But while Guardiola does this with surgical precision, Nancy blends a bit of chaos with control, and Diniz dives headfirst into total chaos.
What we’re seeing are three guys trying to find different ways to control the game. There’s no right way to play. What matters is the result, and in that sense, they’re all right. Nancy’s style, with its flexibility, is a breath of fresh air in a world where pragmatism rules. Guardiola, with his methodical order, continues to be the standard of excellence. And Diniz, with his controlled chaos, brings a unique energy that challenges the norm.
So, when someone asks if Nancy, Guardiola, and Diniz are similar, the answer is a big “it depends.” They’re incredibly alike and completely different at the same time. And that’s what makes them so fascinating. They’re masters of their own philosophies, all aiming for the same thing: to control the game.